Saturday, December 12, 2009

Geothermal Project in California Is Shut Down



This article in the NYTimes shows the importance of doing a full life cycle assessment on emerging technologies before proceeding forward. The quickest and most important actions that will mitigate climate change- are the modifications of our behaviors and patterns- we can't rely on these new constructed science techniques to come in and save the day.

By JAMES GLANZ in NY Times
Published: December 11, 2009


The company in charge of a California project to extract vast amounts of renewable energy from deep, hot bedrock has removed its drill rig and informed federal officials that the government project will be abandoned.

The project by the company, AltaRock Energy, was the Obama administration’s first major test of geothermal energy as a significant alternative to fossil fuels and the project was being financed with federal Department of Energy money at a site about 100 miles north of San Francisco called the Geysers.

But on Friday, the Energy Department said that AltaRock had given notice this week that “it will not be continuing work at the Geysers” as part of the agency’s geothermal development program.

The project’s apparent collapse comes a day after Swiss government officials permanently shut down a similar project in Basel, because of the damaging earthquakes it produced in 2006 and 2007. Taken together, the two setbacks could change the direction of the Obama administration’s geothermal program, which had raised hopes that the earth’s bedrock could be quickly tapped as a clean and almost limitless energy source.

The Energy Department referred other questions about the project’s shutdown to AltaRock, a startup company based in Seattle. Reached by telephone, the company’s chief operations officer, James T. Turner, confirmed that the rig had been removed but said he had not been informed of the notice that the company had given the government. Two other senior company officials did not respond to requests for comment, and it was unclear whether AltaRock might try to restart the project with private money.

In addition to a $6 million grant from the Energy Department, AltaRock had attracted some $30 million in venture capital from high-profile investors like Google, Khosla Ventures and Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers.

“Some of these startup companies got out in front and convinced some venture capitalists that they were very close to commercial deployment,” said Daniel P. Schrag, a professor of geology and director of the Center for the Environment at Harvard University.

Geothermal enthusiasts asserted that drilling miles into hard rock, as required by the technique, could be done quickly and economically with small improvements in existing methods, Professor Schrag said. “What we’ve discovered is that it’s harder to make those improvements than some people believed,” he added.

In fact, AltaRock immediately ran into snags with its drilling, repeatedly snapping off bits in shallow formations called caprock. The project’s safety was also under review at the Energy Department after federal officials said the company had not been entirely forthcoming about the earthquakes produced in Basel in making the case for the Geysers project.

The results of that review have not yet been announced, but the type of geothermal energy explored in Basel and at the Geysers requires fracturing the bedrock then circulating water through the cracks to produce steam. By its nature, fracturing creates earthquakes, though most of them are small.

On Friday, the Energy Department, which has put some $440 million into its geothermal program this year alone, said that despite the latest developments, it remained confident of the technology’s long-term prospects. Many geothermal methods do not require drilling so deep or fracturing bedrock.

“The Department of Energy believes that geothermal energy holds enormous potential to heat our homes and power our economy while decreasing our carbon pollution,” said Stephanie Mueller, a spokeswoman.

AltaRock has also received some $25 million in federal money for a project in Oregon, and some scientists speculated on Friday that after the spate of problems at the Geysers, the company wanted to focus on a new site.

But the company, whose project at the Geysers was located on land leased from the federal government by the Northern California Power Agency, has held information about its project tightly. Not even the power agency has been informed of AltaRock’s ultimate intentions at the site, said Murray Grande, who is in charge of geothermal facilities for the agency.

“They just probably gave up, but we don’t know,” Mr. Grande said. “We have nothing official from them at all.”

But a resident of the nearby town of Anderson Springs, which is already shaken by quakes generated by less ambitious geothermal projects, reacted with jubilation when told it appeared the new project was ending.

“How I feel is beyond anything that words can express,” said the resident, Jacque Felber, who added that an unnerving quake had rattled her property the night before. “I’m just so relieved, because with this going on, I’m afraid one of these days it’s going to knock my house off the hill.”

Wednesday, December 9, 2009

Who Lives here? Who can Afford to Live here?

A friend of mine just posted this link- it's an interactive map that looks at income demographics and the rents of neighborhoods all over NYC.

Very much worth checking out.


http://envisioningdevelopment.net/map

Tuesday, December 1, 2009

Combined Sewage Overflows and UV LEDS

Hello

My professor at Pratt sent out an email conversation that happened between Paul Mankiewicz's who teaches the water quality class at Pratt. She wanted to share this email conversation because it embodies our whole systems approach....Below you will see a proposal for handling the raw sewage that flows untreated into NYC's surrounding water bodies during wet weather events due to our combined sewer system.

Cheers,
Tyler

"Dear Harbor Ecology Friends,

I would be grateful if you'd join me in exploring the possibility of using ultraviolet light emitting diodes to disinfect combined sewage overflows at the waterfront. It might be worthwhile to partner with the LED industry and a local university to create a test site. Would you be willing to meet to explore this possibility?

I first proposed this idea to the Mayor's Office for Sustainability and Long-term Planning and some years ago, and the technologies involved (UV LEDs and on-site generation using solar panels and wind turbines) have advanced significantly in even that short period of time. With outlets designed to generate turbulence (to assure changeover in exposed waters, to overcome the high turbidity that prevents UV penetration), UV LEDs could eliminate all or much of the bacterial load of CSOs before estuary contact.

Our current sewage treatment system uses mercury arc lights to bombard water with UV and EUV rays. Arc lights are cheaper than LEDs, but the price of LEDs lowers annually (as do photovoltaic panel prices). Tighter wavelength LEDs like UV cost more than those producing long wavelengths, like red. They are being adopted, however, by sewage plant designers in Southeast Asia, among other places: http://www.aseanenvironment.info/Abstract/41013577.pdf

When UV LED prices lower sufficiently, distributed disinfection at individual CSOs will become viable. That should be within the coming decade.

Why at the CSO rather than upstream? Because they are easy to access and have less water flowing through them than large tubes, making it easier for UV light to penetrate through the flow, and lower water volumes are easier to make turbulent. This also allows us to target sites mostly likely to damage habitat and human health -- we might start with one of what I dubbed the "Nasty Nine" worst CSOs.

LEDs are tough -- they require little maintenance. Solar panels and wind turbines allow for off-grid work on the waterfront, though many CSOs are quite near electric street lamps, allowing for an easy line extension.

I believe that with this system installed, NYC could free its harbor of much of its bacterial problem without expensive infrastructure additions or added chemical disinfection. Wildlife and stray animal eyesight, if that's found to be put at risk by the equipment, could be guaranteed by motion-sensor shutoffs and deterrents.

I've been invited to join the Manhattan Chamber of Commerce's technology committee and I'd be happy to ask colleagues for support in this endeavor. Local universities might also be ideal partners.

This LED UV solution to CSOs isn't complete, however. We need a serious requirement to install bioswales (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bioswale), green roofs, and permeable surfaces, and to plant even more trees. Only those measures will reduce the runoffs, which carry chemical pollutants that can't be addressed by UV LEDs (though the good news is that the worst of this problem is swept along with the first ten minutes of rain, which is typically caught by the system before CSOs are opened)."


PAUL's RESPONSE......


"..It would be nice if some super technology would come along to solve the combined sewer problem, but am afraid we already know how to do this:
Solid state light production is neat indeed, but how to get all that water in contact with light sources is not simple to do.
Discharge less (or no) water from the land;
enhance natural filters in the water.

The City is putting at least a billion dollars, maybe two billion, into producing ultraviolet light to kill microbes in Croton water.
Water has to be clear and clean enough not to absorb the UV before it hits the microbe, and, even though UV does work OK for Cryptosporidium, it is not effective on many bacteria..."

Humic matter is absorbs UV, as does suspended solids.
better, perhaps, to put in a filter that costs little (less than 100K for aquaculture media for enough mussels to filter 2 billion gpd)
and connects with the food chain and food web that sustains much of the life in the Hudson and Atlantic





paul

Paul S. Mankiewicz, Ph.D.
Executive Director
The Gaia Institute
440 City Island Avenue
Bronx, NY 10464
718 885-1906 office
paul@thegaiainstitute.org
www.thegaiainstitute.org

New York City Soil & Water Conservation District
121 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10013
www.nycswcd.net

NYC urge the city council to approve Green Buildings!

Not many people know this, but NYC buildings account for 80% of
our city's carbon emissions.

That's why the City Council must act NOW on the Greener, Greater
Building Plan that would be the single biggest step in reducing
our carbon footprint and growing New York's green economy.

The City Council needs to act on this plan, but they only have
two meetings left. That means they need to hear from New Yorkers
like you and me!

That's why I'm writing you now. On December 9, the City Council
is meeting and we need them to act now on a proposal that to
significantly reduce our city's carbon footprint and grow the
green economy: the Greener, Greater Buildings Plan.

I've written the Council asking them to approve this critical
plan, and I'm hoping you'll consider doing the same. Will you
check it out? Your voice right now could be the wake-up call
they need to approve it by the end of the year. Here's the link
to find out more:

http://ga3.org/campaign/grn_building_1109/

In New York City, the stakes of global warming are too high to
ignore:

- Increased electricity loads will result in more frequent power
outages.
- Biological and chemical changes will lead to a decrease of
water quality.
- Streets, basements, and sewers will flood more frequently.
- Public transportation and low-lying highways will face
increased delays.

And as you and I both know, climate change won't wait for
undecided lawmakers.

The Greener, Greater Building plan is the world's most ambitious
plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from existing buildings.
And it will help grow New York City's green economy. But it
won't mean anything unless it passes.

You can help make sure it does - just click here to write the
City Council today!

http://ga3.org/campaign/grn_building_1109/

Thank you for anything you can do to help!

http://ga3.org/campaign/grn_building_1109?rk=wpgisCEaQtC8W